Tools

Buy vs. Build Sales Compensation Calculator

Every hour your analyst spends on the commission tool is an hour they aren't spending on the business.

Compare the total cost over your horizon of building an internal commission tool with an AI coding assistant vs. buying EasyComp. The build side includes coding, maintenance, and the manual admin work that stays with your team for any feature you don't build.

Your inputs

Only used when Integrations is selected below.

Features to build

Advanced assumptions
Default: $75/h (≈ $150K/yr ÷ 2,000 h).
Used to convert analyst hours into FTE equivalents.
Percentage added to build hours.
Maintenance hours scale with rep count.

Comparison

3-year total cost
—
—
EasyComp total
$0
over 3 years
Build total
$0
over 3 years
Difference
$0
—
Analyst hours
0
over horizon
Cumulative cost over time EasyComp Build

Cost breakdown

Category EasyComp Build

Per-feature breakdown

Feature Status Build hrs Maint / yr Manual / yr $ / yr

What the dollars don't show

The math above only compares hours and infrastructure. These four risks stay with the build option no matter what the total ends up being.

  • Key-person riskThe tool lives in one analyst's head; when they leave, so does the know-how.
  • Controls & auditApprovals, locked periods and an audit trail have to be built, then defended to finance.
  • Errors hit paychecksA formula slip becomes an over- or underpayment and a trust problem.
  • Time to valueEvery month spent building is another close run on spreadsheets.
Book an EasyComp demo

All calculations use the assumptions listed in the Advanced assumptions panel. Manual admin work counts only the work that would remain if a feature is NOT built into your internal tool. Admin work that stays with any solution (plan design, quota setting, approvals) is excluded from both sides.

Ready to bring
clarity to your sales compensation?

Let us show you how EasyComp can work for your team in a live demo.